Space, you got it wrong bro... Military dictators ke time pe safety kahaan se ho gai bhai???
You know who created taliban? And then under whose rule they started blowing themselves up.
Go ask the people of Karachi (me included) we felt the safest during PPP rule or Zia/Mushy ? Like i said both are Evil but the democrats are much worse when compared to the dictators
, the dictators use army to put fear into the people and the democrats use PEOPLES AMN COMMITTEE/PSF. Army did not kidnap for ransom, AMN COMMITTEE/PSF did. Army did not start the BHATTA MAFIA MQM/ANP/AMN COMMITTEE did. You must have older people in your house hold who have seen the safe and secure times of Pakistan during Ayub/Zia ask them and you will know the answer, my parents never had concern for me staying out late at night in my teens (1980s Zia's time), but since the 1st PPP govt in the late 80 and 90s (the start of kidnapping for ransom profession) my house curfew was 10pm, so I KNOW from personal experience when the lives of common man were safer and which party kay jiyalay/ghunday destroyed the personal safety fabric of Karachi/Pakistan.
Military dictators key time pai, if halat went bad, army would be sent to the city immediately and they would kill these bastards without thinking and the remaining ghundas of political parties (jiyalay/PSF badmash) would go into hiding or would be killed or would be jailed by.
You may disagree, but please don't tell me I got it wrong
, that insults me, I have personally lived through the different times this nation has gone through, KID.
AS for the taliban, they were an extention of the Afghan Mujahids, who were created,trained and financed by the greatest 'DEMOCRACY' of all time, The USA (go watch Charlie Wilsons War it will be more palatable a lesson in actual history for you). Once the taliban became a liability for the USA they were to be eliminated and thats when they turned their guns on their former masters. The taliban were not created to enforce shariah by gun on Pakistan, they were part of the strategic depth policy created by the democratic govt of USA (back when USA considered India an unfriendly country). Pakistani generals played their part no question, but that would have happened regardless of who was in power, you are saying that a non-military leader would have had the balls to say no to USA ? when they beg the americans for aid so they can loot the coffers ? in fact if anything its much more difficult to control one man then it is to simply buy out the whole 'for sale' parliament of Pakistan. Example, during Mushys time there was a very small and very limited DRONE ATTACK regime which got converted into full fledged undeclared war on Pakistan the moment these democratic sellout bastards came to power. So learn to decipher junk democratic propaganda and learn to read between the lines, everything is not as straight forward as you think it is.